So ok, what did you do CT? Would you want to share your process (in simple words for me please lol)? You know I would but I really don't think it would help much, it's fairly complex and a large number of steps involved. The rub is there is no "magic formula" for making scans good, every ...
It's pretty straight, still has a fair amount of pattern in it having more dots makes it little easier to blend them out, the fine text and tiny details are what suffer, it came out mostly legible I think...
Might be more work than some would be able or willing to do though
The only dpi that matters is the optical one and I'm sure your scanner can't do 9600dpi optically, the rest is "software enhanced" and highly undesirable not to mention irrelevant to this discussion. We are really getting off-topic here, this is purely to help Chewy understand "her&qu...
You should scan at the max optical resolution of your device, which I think you said was 1200dpi then reduce that to 600dpi and post it, that will be as good as it will get.
Still might not be good enough to really be useful, we will have to see
Roseflamingo wrote:Seen the movie, same old format, just watching Steven Seagal getting fatter and older and balder. Will miss you Steven but time to retire.
Frozen - sample.jpg That's not grain, it's called a moiré pattern (pronounced more-ay). In a scanned image, Moiré patterns are caused by interference between two sets of fine pattern grids, the scanner samples and the halftone screen in the original image. Any scanner will do this, it's a simple fa...
Chewy is correct in one thing though, not to say that is her case, just that many scanners are not capable of producing a quality scan, this is due in large part to the "optical resolution" limitations of the hardware, no matter what software you use "physical" limitations canno...